Public trust in state institutions

Naveed Rafaqat Ahmad
February 1, 2026

Digitisation can be the biggest tool to reform access to over-burdened state institutions

Public trust in state  institutions


T

rust in public institutions is one of the most valuable assets a state can have. When citizens believe that courts will deliver justice, police will protect them, utility companies will provide reliable services and the tax system will be fair, society functions smoothly. When that trust weakens, the cost can be very high—economic activity slows down, social cohesion weakens and frustrations grow. Pakistan has long faced this challenge. It is important to recognise that the country is now taking meaningful, positive steps to rebuild confidence in its institutions through reforms focused on transparency, access and service delivery.

Trust does not disappear overnight; and it does not return overnight either. It is built through consistent experience. For many years, citizens felt that government systems were slow, complex and distant from their everyday needs. Long court cases, delayed police response, unreliable utilities and a tax system seen as uneven contributed to a sense that the system did not work for ordinary citizens. The result was not rebellion, but disengagement. Many people avoided formal channels, relied on informal solutions and lost faith in collective rules. This erosion of trust had real economic and social costs.

Recognising this, Pakistan has increasingly shifted its reform focus toward improving how public institutions serve citizens, not just how they are managed internally. One of the most important areas of reform has been the justice system. Case backlog, which once ran into millions nationwide, is being addressed through alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, digitisation of court records and faster case-tracking systems. E-courts and online cause lists have reduced unnecessary delays and travel costs. Where pilot reforms have been implemented, disposal rates have improved and litigants have gained better visibility into their cases. Faster justice directly strengthens trust because it signals fairness and predictability.

Police reforms have also moved in the right direction. Across provinces, Police Departments have introduced complaint management systems, helplines and online reporting tools. These allow citizens to register complaints without fear or delay. Performance monitoring and technology-based oversight have improved response times and reduced discretionary abuse. Where community policing models have been applied, crime reporting has increased, showing that citizens are more willing to engage with law enforcement when they feel heard and protected. Trust in policing improves when accountability is visible and access is easy.

Utilities, particularly electricity and gas, have long been a major source of public frustration. Recent reforms have focused on improving billing transparency, reducing losses and targeting subsidies more effectively. Smart meters, digital billing and customer service portals are gradually improving service reliability and complaint resolution. Investment in renewable energy, especially solar power, has reduced dependence on expensive imports and lowered operational costs. These changes may seem technical, but their impact on trust is direct. When bills are understandable and supply is predictable, citizens regain confidence in service providers.

Taxation is another area where trust is being rebuilt through reform. Historically, Pakistan’s tax system suffered from narrow coverage and low compliance, leading to a perception that only a small segment of society carried the burden. Recent initiatives have focused on documentation, digital filing and data integration to make the system fairer and simpler. The number of income tax filers has increased steadily over recent years, reflecting improved confidence in the system. When taxpayers see that the process is transparent and enforcement is more even, voluntary compliance rises. This strengthens state revenue and reduces reliance on borrowing.

The economic cost of distrust has been significant. Informality has limited productivity, discouraged investment and reduced tax collection. Studies show that economies with low institutional trust experience slower growth and higher transaction costs because people spend more time and resources protecting themselves rather than investing. Pakistan’s recent reforms aim to reverse this by making formal systems more reliable than informal alternatives. Digital governance, streamlined approvals and online service delivery reduce human discretion and increase predictability, which is essential for economic confidence.

Social cohesion is also deeply linked to institutional trust. When citizens believe that systems are fair, they are more willing to follow rules and resolve disputes peacefully. Reforms in local government and service delivery have helped bring institutions closer to communities. Where municipal services, water supply and sanitation are managed locally with clearer accountability, citizen satisfaction improves. International experience shows that trust grows fastest when people see results in their immediate environment. Pakistan’s gradual decentralisation efforts reflect this understanding.

Social protection programmes have strengthened trust among vulnerable groups. Data-driven cash transfer systems now reach millions of households, especially women, with minimal leakage. Independent assessments show that these programmes improve food security, health services access and school attendance. When citizens experience the state as a source of support rather than hardship, trust deepens. This has long-term benefits for social stability and inclusion.

Importantly, rebuilding trust is not about denying past shortcomings. It is about demonstrating improvement. Countries that successfully restored public confidence—such as Indonesia after major institutional reforms—focused on transparency, consistency and delivery. Pakistan is increasingly following this path by measuring outcomes, publishing data and using technology to reduce discretion.

The reforms currently under way are also reshaping the relationship between citizens and the state. In some cases, online portals for licences, registrations and public services have reduced waiting times from weeks to days. This signals respect for citizens’ time and effort. Trust grows when people feel the system values them.

Looking ahead, the solution lies in continuity and deepening reform. Institutions must have time to learn and improve. Investment in training, data systems and technology will further enhance service quality. Clear rules, consistent enforcement and visible accountability will strengthen confidence across society.

Trust is not rebuilt through slogans. It is rebuilt through experience. Each faster court case, each fair tax assessment, each reliable utility bill adds to public confidence. Pakistan’s reform journey shows that when institutions focus on service delivery and fairness, trust begins to return.

The collapse of trust was costly. Its rebuilding offers great rewards. Stronger institutions mean a stronger economy, a more cohesive society and a more confident future. Pakistan’s ongoing reforms demonstrate that trust can be restored—not overnight, but steadily—through commitment, capability and care for citizens.


The writer is a chartered accountant and a business analyst.

Public trust in state institutions