close
Money Matters

The great grid exit

By  Sarim Zia
09 March, 2026

A strange paradox has emerged in Pakistan’s economy this February 2026. While the government celebrates a modest GDP recovery and the Pakistan Stock Exchange hits record highs, the national grid faces a silent, existential crisis as economic growth ‘decouples’ from grid demand.

SOLAR POWER

The great grid exit

A strange paradox has emerged in Pakistan’s economy this February 2026. While the government celebrates a modest GDP recovery and the Pakistan Stock Exchange hits record highs, the national grid faces a silent, existential crisis as economic growth ‘decouples’ from grid demand.

Data for early 2026 reveals that while the population expands and urban centres swell, grid electricity sales remain depressed. This is not a miracle of energy efficiency; it will be remembered as the beginning of a massive grid exit. Upper middle-class households and industries alike are escaping through the roof, installing an estimated 14.5 GW of distributed solar capacity by the end of the last fiscal year, nearly one-fourth of the total grid supply. This mass migration will leave the state-managed system in a fiscal tailspin, as the very consumers who once cross-subsidised the system will be generating their own power.

The recent government move to slash industrial tariffs is a desperate attempt to lure these ‘productive’ consumers back. However, once a factory invests in its own captive power, it rarely returns to the volatility of a state-managed grid. These industrial players have learned that reliability and price predictability are worth more than the occasional, politically motivated relief package. As a result, the grid is losing its most reliable revenue-generating base, forcing the burden of its massive fixed costs onto a shrinking pool of residential users.

Nepra recently attempted to stem this tide by notifying the Prosumer Regulations 2026, which effectively ended the ‘golden era’ of solar net metering and changed it to net billing for new consumers. By replacing the unit-for-unit exchange with a restrictive Net Billing model, the state has slashed buyback rates from approximately Rs26 to nearly Rs 8 per unit.

The logic behind this ‘tax on the sun’ is as simple as it is desperate: as more households go solar, the massive capacity payments, the fixed costs for power plants, currently projected at over Rs2.1 trillion for the calendar year, will have to be recovered from an ever-shrinking pool of remaining grid-dependent users. Rather than reforming the systemic inefficiencies and high transmission losses of DISCOs, the regulator will effectively be penalising the citizens who invested their own capital to reduce the national fuel import bill.

However, the state’s attempt to tether solar users to the grid via low buyback rates will likely backfire. With global lithium-ion battery prices reaching new lows in 2026, the math of energy independence will fundamentally change. Homeowners will no longer be content with selling their surplus electricity to DISCOs at a pittance only to buy it back at the full retail rate of over Rs60 per unit at night. Instead, they will make one-time capital investments in battery storage. For the affluent, the choice will become clear: they will go completely off grid. By severing the connection to the national grid entirely, these consumers will escape the ever-rising taxes, surcharges and the newly imposed monthly fixed charges.

Rather than viewing distributed generation as an enemy of the state, DISCOs must be transformed into agile entities that facilitate modern energy usage rather than penalising it

This will create a dangerous social and fiscal divide. The Grid Exit will become an option only for those who can afford the upfront cost of panels and storage, leaving the trillion-rupee burden of circular debt, currently hovering around Rs1.9 trillion, and the massive fixed capacity payments to fall onto the shoulders of the lower-middle class and vulnerable populations who will have no choice but to stay.

Because these fixed costs (including capacity payment charges) must be recovered from fewer and fewer units sold, the tariffs for those who remain fully dependent on the grid will inevitably rise. These charges will be divided among those who are not exiting, creating a self-reinforcing cycle where the grid becomes a poverty trap: an expensive, nationwide infrastructure maintained solely by those with no other choice.

The government’s response this month, imposing fixed monthly charges of up to Rs675 even on domestic protected consumers, is a clear sign of fiscal panic. To survive, Pakistan must stop fighting the future and accept that the old model of central reliance is eroding. Rather than viewing distributed generation as an enemy of the state, DISCOs must be transformed into agile entities that facilitate modern energy usage rather than penalising it. This transformation requires the state to aggressively retire inefficient, decades-old thermal plants that no longer serve the public interest but continue to bloat the capacity payment burden.

To save the grid, the government must pivot toward an integration strategy. The path forward lies in recognising rooftop solar not as a threat, but as a strategic green asset that can stabilise the national energy balance. Instead of curtailing solar through punitive billing, the state should invest in grid-level battery storage to bridge the gap between daytime generation and nighttime peak demand.

In this context, Pakistan has a unique opportunity to lead with sodium-ion battery technology. Unlike lithium, which relies on a volatile global supply chain, Pakistan can leverage its own indigenous salt resources to create a sovereign, cost-effective, and thermally stable storage infrastructure. Sodium-ion batteries are better suited for Pakistan’s extreme ambient temperatures and offer a path to energy security that is immune to international market shocks. Investing in utility-scale sodium-ion storage would allow the national grid to ‘soak up’ excess solar power during the day and release it when needed, turning the threat of grid defection into a robust grid-supporting mechanism.

This technological pivot represents the final exit ramp before the grid’s structural collapse. By embracing storage rather than fighting solar, the state can transform the grid from a failing monopoly into a modern, resilient network. However, the window for this transition is closing rapidly. Pakistan cannot tax its way out of a structural collapse.

If we continue to treat the national grid as a debt-recovery tool rather than an engine for growth, the Grid Exit will only accelerate. Without a shift from punitive regulation to innovative integration, we risk leaving behind an archaeological monument to bad planning, a hollowed-out system powered only by the debt of those with no other choice.


The writer is a research assistant at the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), Islamabad.

More From Money Matters
Trading through tensions
By Atteq ur Rehman

Long-term strategy for deficit
By Engineer Hussain Ahmad Siddiqui

The tipping point
By Ahsan Malik

Rebuilding industrial strength
By Engineer Hussain Ahmad Siddiqui

How to bridge the skills gap
By Syed Qasim Haider

Banking, ethics and algorithms
By Zunaib Khanzada