close

How are the SDGs doing?

February 28, 2026
The representational image illustrates the global challenge of water scarcity and the critical importance of conserving water resources.  — The News/File
The representational image illustrates the global challenge of water scarcity and the critical importance of conserving water resources.  — The News/File

The Asia and the Pacific SDG Progress Report 2026, published by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), marks a critical moment for the region’s commitment to the 2030 Agenda.

With only five years remaining to Agenda 2030, the report indicates not routine underperformance but a structural divergence from agreed development targets. At the current pace, approximately 88 per cent of the measurable SDG targets are projected to be missed by 2030. This shows that a systemic gap exists between policy ambition and implementation outcomes.

While Asia-Pacific remains a global engine of economic growth and innovation, the report shows a misalignment between growth patterns and sustainable development objectives. Several SDGs have no targets currently on track. The region faces a defining contradiction: the same industrialisation and rapid economic expansion that lifted millions out of poverty are now exerting significant environmental pressures.

The region’s most tangible successes lie in poverty reduction, health improvements and infrastructure expansion. Under SDG 1 (No Poverty), international poverty levels have declined steadily over the past decades, though progress has slowed in recent years. Similarly, under SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), measurable reductions in maternal and child mortality demonstrate the effectiveness of targeted health and social protection policies.

The most concerning trends under SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) are compliance with labour rights and the incidence of occupational injuries, both of which show signs of regression in the region. The continued decline in the share of labour income in GDP, coupled with the growing human cost of migration, shows the deep-rooted and multifaceted nature of inequality in the region.

Infrastructure and connectivity have also advanced significantly. SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure) shows comparatively strong performance, particularly in expanding mobile network coverage. Access to electricity under SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) has expanded across much of the region, while gradual improvements continue in the provision of safely managed water and sanitation services under SDG 6.

However, these gains are subject to emerging risks. Rising out-of-pocket health expenditures threaten household financial stability, and antimicrobial resistance poses new public health challenges. Learning outcomes under SDG 4 (Quality Education) have stagnated or regressed in several subregions. While electricity access has improved, the share of renewable energy in the total energy mix is not increasing at the pace required for climate commitments.

The most significant area of concern identified in the 2026 assessment is environmental sustainability. Progress across climate action, biodiversity conservation, and responsible consumption remains insufficient or regressive.

Under SDG 13 (Climate Action), greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise in parts of the region, undermining mitigation efforts. Persistent fossil fuel subsidies remain a barrier to accelerating the energy transition. At the same time, the region struggles to decouple economic growth from resource consumption, as reflected in stagnant trends in material footprint and domestic material consumption.

Ecosystem pressures are intensifying. The Red List Index under SDG 15 (Life on Land) indicates ongoing biodiversity decline, while land degradation continues to undermine agricultural resilience and ecosystem stability. Under SDG 14 (Life Below Water), marine ecosystems face stress from overfishing, pollution, and coastal degradation.

Urban areas illustrate the tension between planning and outcomes. While countries increasingly adopt disaster risk reduction strategies (Target 11.b under SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities), disaster-related losses and infrastructure damage remain high. These patterns suggest that policy adoption has not yet been translated into fully resilient systems.

The principle of ‘leave no one behind’ remains central to the 2030 Agenda, yet progress on inequality and institutional effectiveness is limited. Under SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), improvements in income distribution remain modest. The labour income share of GDP shows declining or stagnant trends in several economies, signalling structural imbalances. Migration-related vulnerabilities persist, including recorded deaths and disappearances.

Institutional effectiveness under SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) presents additional challenges. Access to justice shows limited improvement, and high numbers of unsentenced detainees in parts of the region indicate systemic bottlenecks. Governance and institutional capacity vary significantly across subregions, affecting the implementation of broader SDG commitments.

Gender equality under SDG 5 remains difficult to fully assess due to data constraints. While there are gradual improvements in women’s representation in leadership positions, progress across broader dimensions of gender equality lacks sufficient and consistent data. Institutional and data limitations thus constrain effective policy responses.

While data availability for SDG indicators has improved, reaching an average of 55% in 2025, significant gaps remain. Persistent and large data gaps are particularly evident for SDG 5 (Gender Equality) and SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). SDG 14 (Life Below Water), SDG 13 (Climate Action) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) also exhibit lower data availability compared to other goals, highlighting the need for strengthened data collection and reporting mechanisms across these areas.

The absence of granular, disaggregated data, by age, sex, disability status and migration status, limits the region’s ability to identify vulnerable populations and design targeted interventions. Strengthening national statistical systems is therefore not merely a technical requirement but a strategic necessity for equitable policy implementation.

The report shows mixed progress on SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals). While digital connectivity, international technical support, public-private partnerships, and trade conditions have improved, key areas such as development effectiveness, domestic revenue, planning tools, debt management and statistical capacity financing are lagging and regressing.

The 2026 Progress Report makes it explicitly clear that incremental reforms will not deliver the ambitions of the 2030 Agenda. The Asia-Pacific region must adopt accelerated and transformative actions that embed climate resilience, environmental sustainability, and social inclusion at the centre of development planning. Phasing out inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies and rapidly scaling up renewable energy deployment are essential to realign economic growth with ecological limits. At the same time, sustained investment in national statistical systems is critical to closing persistent data gaps, strengthening accountability, and enabling evidence-based policymaking that effectively responds to inequality and vulnerability.

Equally important is the strengthening of both physical and institutional resilience to safeguard development gains. Protecting critical infrastructure, modernising justice systems and reinforcing transparent and effective governance structures will enhance stability in the face of climate shocks and economic uncertainty.

With only a few years remaining until 2030, the region’s legacy will depend on its ability to transition from growth-centred development towards an environmentally sustainable, socially inclusive and institutionally resilient model through integrated and decisive reforms.


The writer is a research associate at the Sustainability and Resilience Programme, Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), Islamabad. The article reflects the writer’s personal views.