Regional threat

Sher Ali Khalti
March 29, 2026

Afghanistan continues to harbour terrorist outfits that threatening neighbouring countries

Regional threat


T

he United Nations Security Council has reiterated long-standing international concerns regarding the presence of terrorist groups in Afghanistan, warning that the country continues to be a base for militant activity despite repeated global calls for action.

The warning comes in the wake of the adoption of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2818 on March 16. The resolution underscores the continued operations of several militant organisations from Afghan territory, including Islamic State Khorasan Province, Al-Qaeda, East Turkestan Islamic Movement, Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan and Balochistan Liberation Army.

The UNSC has once again stressed that Afghan soil must not be used to shelter, train, plan or finance terrorist acts, reiterating a position that has remained consistent for decades.

The UNSC’s latest position reflects a continuation of concerns first formally articulated in United Nations Security Council Resolution 1267. Adopted in 1999, the resolution condemned the then-Taliban regime for providing safe havens to terrorist groups, particularly Al-Qaeda and allowing Afghan territory to be used as a staging ground for international terrorism.

More than 25 years later, the language and focus of the Council’s warnings remain largely unchanged, highlighting a persistent challenge in ensuring compliance with international counterterrorism obligations. Resolution 2818 builds upon this historical framework, indicating that despite repeated resolutions, monitoring mechanisms and international engagement, concerns about militant presence in Afghanistan have not been fully addressed.

The resolution identifies several groups that continue to maintain operational capabilities within Afghanistan. Among them, ISIL-K has been noted for carrying out attacks in the region. Al-Qaeda remains associated with trans-national militancy with historical roots in the country. The ETIM, the TTP and the BLA are also cited as organisations that have either maintained a presence or demonstrated the ability to operate from Afghan territory.

The UNSC document emphasises that the continued existence and activities of these groups pose a threat not only to regional stability but also to international security. It reiterates that member states expect Afghan authorities to take verifiable and sustained action against such entities.

The adoption of Resolution 2818 reflects a pattern of recurring warnings from the international community. Over the years, the UNSC has passed resolutions addressing terrorism concerns in Afghanistan, often repeating similar language regarding safe havens and militant networks. This continuity suggests that earlier calls for action have not resulted in the level of compliance or enforcement expected by the global body.

The consistent emphasis on preventing the use of Afghan territory for terrorist purposes indicates that the issue remains unresolved. The resolution also highlights concerns about gaps between commitments and implementation, as well as challenges in monitoring and verification within the country.

The resolution identifies several groups that continue to maintain operational capabilities within Afghanistan. Among those, ISIL-K has been noted for carrying out attacks in the region. Al-Qaeda remains associated with trans-national militancy with historical roots in the country.

While the UNSC resolution outlines international expectations, the Taliban leadership has consistently maintained a different position regarding counterterrorism efforts. Officials have, in various statements, described their actions as focused on internal security and sovereignty. At the same time, they have framed external criticism as interference, often emphasising civilian impacts and humanitarian concerns in response to international pressure.

The UNSC resolution reiterates the expectation that Afghan authorities must uphold their commitments under international law.

In addition to security-related issues, the resolution comes amid continued scrutiny of governance conditions in Afghanistan. The international community has raised concerns over restrictions affecting women’s education, employment and participation in public life. These issues contribute to broader questions about governance, legitimacy and international engagement.

Observers note that such concerns may influence the willingness of countries and organisations to engage with Afghan authorities on security matters. The UNSC’s focus on terrorism, combined with wider governance issues, underscores the complexity of the situation in Afghanistan, where security, political and social challenges remain deeply interconnected.

The continued mention of multiple militant groups in a single resolution reflects concerns about the country’s potential role as a hub for transnational networks.

Regional countries have expressed concerns about cross-border implications, particularly in relation to groups such as the TTP and the ISIL-K. The presence of such organisations has been linked to security challenges beyond Afghanistan’s borders, affecting neighboring states and international interests.

The resolution calls for sustained vigilance and cooperation among member states, emphasising the need for coordinated efforts to address threats emerging from the region.

With the adoption of Resolution 2818, the United Nations Security Council has reaffirmed its position that Afghanistan must not serve as a sanctuary for terrorist organizations. The resolution highlights the continued presence of multiple militant groups and underscores the expectation of concrete action by Afghan authorities.

More than two decades after Resolution 1267 first raised alarm over terrorist safe havens in Afghanistan, the core concerns remain consistent. The latest resolution reflects continuity in international priorities and ongoing challenges in achieving lasting compliance.

As the global community continues to monitor developments, the effectiveness of future efforts will depend on the extent to which commitments translate into measurable actions on the ground.


The author works for The News. He can be contacted at [email protected].

Regional threat