Haramosh and Diamer continue to bear the cost of Pakistan’s climate crisis
| S |
atellites scan the peaks and sensors relay real-time data, yet in the high Himalayas, the collapse of a mountain can still outpace the warning. The August floods along the Nepal-China border laid bare that tension: detection technology exists but translating the warning into disaster preventing action remains an uncertain race.
The Nepal disaster is particularly relevant to Pakistan. Gilgit-Baltistan shares many of the same geographical and climatic characteristics. Pakistan is among the countries most exposed to climate-related disasters. The agricultural economy’s dependence on the mountain cryosphere makes the issue especially critical.
Gilgit-Baltistan, home to more than 8,000 glaciers, is at the heart of this vulnerability. Its glaciers are a vital source of water, feeding rivers, streams, lakes and irrigation systems that sustain communities far beyond the mountain valleys. The terrain that makes the region a crucial water reservoir also makes it highly vulnerable to sudden and destructive environmental changes.
Loss of ice is not the only risk. Here, an entire mountain system may become unstable. Gilgit-Baltistan faces the same hazards almost every year. Its steep and fragile mountain terrain is exposed to glacial lake outburst and flash floods, glacier and ice collapses, landslides, rockfalls, avalanches and debris flows. These unleash torrents of rock and sediment, destabilise slopes and damage roads, bridges, homes, agricultural land and infrastructure.
According to the Pakistan Met Department, “25 percent above-average rainfall caused intense flash flooding across Gilgit-Baltistan.” PMD sources say that no GLOF event was reported this season; however, the Gilgit-Baltistan Disaster Management Authority says a lake outburst from the Hispar glacier triggered flash flooding.
The region experienced 120 floods triggered by heavy rains between June and August, says Shahzad Baig, the Gilgit-Baltistan Disaster Management Authority’s assistant director. “These damaged 535 houses, killing 900 livestock. 25 kilometres of roads and 31 bridges were damaged or washed away.”
As many as ten districts of Gilgit-Baltistan suffered varying degrees of damage. The flooding affected local communities and damaged vital links and facilities in several areas. “Gilgit, Diamer and Ghizer were among the worst-affected districts, recording dozens of incidents of flash flooding, mudflows and riverine erosion.”
Floods in the high valleys of Gilgit-Baltistan arrive without warning and leave scars that last long after the water recedes.
Local journalist Samar Abbas Qadhafi from Haramosh, Gilgit, says the region witnessed 34 flash floods this season. “The valley’s only powerhouse was destroyed by flash floods over a month ago and remains unrepaired.”
This outage has left the entire valley without electricity. “Beyond heating, the lack of electricity means that water pumps do not work.”
As the cold intensifies, the blackout, initially an inconvenience, turns into a serious threat.
In Khaltaro, Qadhafi reports “severe shortages of food and essential medicines.” The nearest dispensary is a two-to-three-hour walk away, he says. He mentions that roads have been washed out by floods.
“For pregnant women, the stretchered journey to the basic dispensary at Sassi on the Karakoram Highway is exhausting and dangerous,” he says. “After reaching Sassi, they must travel another hour by road to Gilgit city, which is 75 kilometres away.”
The Babusar Valley in Diamer was hit by flash floods and mudflows thatdestroyed 162 houses. 12 bridges collapsed and 42 irrigation channels were damaged. Data on damage to schools and dispensaries is not available.
Many of the fertile fields of Diamer have been buried under heavy layers of rock, mud and debris after 28 flash floods and mudflows hit the region.
According to Faizullah Farak, a local analyst, the damage to farmland has been massive. Most farmers here grow maize, potato and wheat to feed their families throughout the year. “With their standing crops crushed and buried, these households have lost their primary food source for the coming months.”
Clearing the rubble is physically demanding. With winter approaching, there is little time. Farak says most farmers will be unable to remove the debris before the ground freezes.
“The floods also destroyed many irrigation channels, cutting off water to some fields that were intact. Without water, the ‘surviving’ crop cannot be saved.”
“Much of the region’s potato has been lost under the debris. Apricot and walnut orchards—crucial secondary sources of income and food—have also suffered heavy damage.”
Across multiple districts, roads remain blocked for days at end. Prices of scarce fuel and food essentials soar in the isolated communities.
Diamer produces abundant, fine quality pine nuts (chilghoza). But when the roads are cut off, it cannot be taken to the market. Water channel damage creates drought conditions for the cash crop.
Local authorities and international observers note that heavy rains, glacial melt and glacial lake outbursts have become more frequent, turning once-rare disasters into a recurring ordeal for communities living on the frontlines of a changing climate.
The Nepal tragedy has kicked off a debate on warning systems, including satellite monitoring of the entire glacial zone. The Gilgit-Baltistan chief minister has called for enhanced satellite-based monitoring of the region’s glaciated areas.
More detailed satellite observation can track changes in glaciers and glacial lakes that may not be visible from the ground, providing critical information on emerging risks. Pakistan is already using satellite imagery for this purpose. SUPARCO monitors glacial lakes, assessing changes in their size and condition to identify signs of increased risk of a glacial lake outburst flood. Its latest assessment identified 131 potentially dangerous glacial-lake locations.
Satellite monitoring is a powerful tool for early warning, but it is no silver bullet against glacial lake outburst floods, says Prof Karamat Ali of the Department of Environment at the Karakoram International University, Gilgit.
“What appears flat and stable from orbit often conceals unstable dynamics unfolding on the ground. Satellites remain a valuable tool, but only when paired with continuous, on-the-ground surveys.”
The harder question is access: many of these high-altitude zones are remote, logistically difficult and dangerous to reach. They sit upstream of communities and critical infrastructure that would bear the brunt of a sudden release. “Identifying and forecasting these events remains inherently difficult,” he argues.
Early warnings have saved lives in well-monitored regions. But for a rapid, long-runout avalanche, the practical lead time is often measured in minutes than hours.
This is exactly what happened in Nepal. Scientists say the flood wave covered almost 14 miles in six minutes and 50 seconds, travelling at an average speed of 193 kilometres per hour.
Another challenge is the installation and maintenance of these systems in remote high-mountain regions.
The PMD has installed 236 hydro-meteorological stations (165 in Gilgit Baltistan and 71 in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) across 24 valleys (16 valleys in Gilgit Baltistan and 8 in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) in northern Pakistan.
Real-time data from these stations is received round the clock at the servers installed at PMD headquarters, the Regional Meteorological Centre Gilgit and the Gilgit Baltistan Disaster Management Authority using satellite communication backed-up with GSM modules, wherever available.
The PMD has also established a GLOF Monitoring Cell that disseminates warnings and alerts to local communities, district administration and disaster mitigation authorities. Sirens are then triggered at vulnerable locations for evacuation.
Nevertheless, challenges abound.
Batteries and solar panels powering early-warning centres get stolen, leaving these vital systems without the power needed to operate. “The consequence is unsettling. When floodwaters begin to rise, communities may have no certainty that the warning system will actually work,” says Prof Ali.
With more than 8,000 glaciers and communities, roads and infrastructure squeezed into narrow valleys, Gilgit-Baltistan must treat these hazards as part of a connected system, not as isolated events. This means linking satellite data, ground sensors, community vigilance and year-round drills into a single, unbroken line of defence.
The writer is a senior The News staffer in Karachi.