close

Sindh’s literary defiance

November 24, 2025
A panel discussion in progress at the Sindh Literature Festival in Karachi on November 21, 2025. — Facebook/ Sindh Literature Festival
A panel discussion in progress at the Sindh Literature Festival in Karachi on November 21, 2025. — Facebook/ Sindh Literature Festival

The 8th Sindh Literature Festival, held on November 15-16, 2025 at Karachi’s Beach Luxury Hotel, once again demonstrated how a province with fragile cultural infrastructure relies almost entirely on volunteer energy, personal goodwill, and a handful of loyal donors to sustain its intellectual pulse.

The theme, 'Celebrate the Power of the Word', sounded aspirational in an era when words are under siege – by political polarisation, digital distraction and eroding public institutions. Yet for two days, a coastal hotel became an unlikely republic of letters where writers, scholars, musicians, activists and curious citizens gathered in a city where ideas often struggle for oxygen. As always, the festival remained an enterprise driven not by money but by conviction. Journalists such as Naseer Gopang and Zohaib Kaka, supported by veteran cultural figures, have carried the SLF for years on shoulders already burdened by day jobs. The team is small, the budget is tight and the logistical challenges are constant.

The festival survives partly through support from the Sindh Culture Department, the Endowment Fund Trust for Heritage, the Sindh Education Foundation and rotating media partners. Yet the donor base is perilously narrow; one cancelled cheque or bureaucratic reshuffle could derail the entire endeavour. What keeps the machine running is not the state but the volunteers who treat the SLF as a civic duty. The festival opened with Local Government Minister Nasir Hussain Shah invoking Sindh’s Sufi heritage of tolerance and love – a comforting speech that contrasted sharply with the realities of public life.

His announcement that the Sindhi language is now available on Google was welcome yet showed how modest linguistic progress remains in a country where national languages are treated as regional ornaments. The contradictions lingered: rhetorical praise for culture from a political class that underfunds libraries, neglects heritage, and presides over some of Pakistan’s worst educational outcomes. Yet the festival grounds told a different story. Stalls selling Ajrak, Rilli, Sindhi caps and handicrafts drew families determined to keep cultural life afloat despite economic strain. Folk musicians performed to lively applause, their instruments surviving even as the institutions meant to protect them decline.

Mahtab Akbar Rashdi, sitting informally among the audience, enjoying the performances like any other visitor, symbolised the festival’s accessible, uncurated spirit. The heart of the SLF lay in its sessions – some uneven, many urgent, a few outstanding. A panel on 'Indus River and Our Future' with Naseer Memon, Dr Hassan Abbas, Masood Lohar and Afia Salam dispensed with romantic metaphors and delivered a stark assessment: a river in distress, reckless upstream politics, collapsing ecology and looming displacement in lower Sindh. Abbas warned that climate change is turning districts into slow-motion disaster zones; Lohar spoke as someone who has watched entire villages disappear.

A widely attended session on contemporary Sindhi literature brought together Madad Ali Sindhi, Akbar Leghari and others to discuss the shrinking space for literary journals, the decline of translation and the dominance of digital forms that reward brevity over depth. Leghari lamented the loss of editorial discipline; Madad Ali Sindhi warned that without institutional support, literature risks becoming a hobby rather than a force. Their candour cut through the polite optimism that often colours festival panels.

The political temperature rose in a session led by Hyder Qadri and Ali Gul Mallah. Their talk, 'Siah Sat ja Nirala Rang' (Strange Ways of Doing Dark Politics), dissected how Sindh’s political class has transformed governance into spectacle. Qadri described how symbols replace substance and narratives of victimhood mask structural decay. Mallah, drawing on rural experience, spoke of the quiet normalisation of dysfunction: the erosion of trust and the manipulation of sentiment that turn politics into theatre. Their conclusion was unsettling: Sindh’s malaise is cultural, woven into the stories that power tells about itself. Amid these weighty discussions, the SLF introduced a series of 15-minute micro-talks.

The festival then shifted to the psychological terrain of the middle class with playwright and critic Shahrukh Nadeem’s talk, 'Trapped Between Fear and Dream'. He sketched a portrait of Pakistan’s anxious middle class – educated and aspirational yet immobilised by economic precarity and social pressure. Families caught between dreams of global mobility and fears of downward slide; schools promising futures they cannot deliver; a cultural climate where bravado masks insecurity. The audience recognised itself in his analysis.

Environmental consciousness resurfaced through Javed Mahar, one of Sindh’s respected conservationists. He dismantled myths with clinical clarity: forests do not regenerate on their own; conservation is not a luxury; and mangroves are central, not peripheral, to Sindh’s survival. The true crisis, he argued, is a profound ecological ignorance. Without education, institutional reform and long-term planning, Sindh may lose not only ecosystems but the capacity to imagine a sustainable future. Waheeda Mahesar, in ‘Fail Fast, Win Big’, urged Sindh’s youth to shed the culturally ingrained fear of failure. Risk aversion, she argued, has become an unseen shackle on innovation.

Aftab Shah offered a striking fusion of mystic poetry and psychology by linking Shah Latif’s seven heroines to Carl Jung’s archetypes. Sassui, Marui, Moomal and others became embodiments of universal struggles: the quest, the shadow, the sacrifice, the longing for transcendence. His argument revealed the philosophical depth embedded in Sindh’s classical literature and captivated listeners. The micro-talk by Mahboob Ali Shar focused on rural talent. His presentation, 'Rural Talent and Pathways to Global Success', challenged the urban bias of Sindh’s institutions. Rural youth, he argued, lack not ability but access. His optimism suggested that Sindh’s future innovators may emerge from overlooked places.

These sessions flowed into a larger conversation on education. The panel, 'Empowering Learners Through Life', with Shehnaz Wazir Ali, Dr Kaiser Bengali, Naseer Memon, Dr Lila Ram and Dr Farid Panjwani, confronted the decay of Sindh’s public education: collapsing schools, outdated teaching, bureaucratic inertia and nonexistent teacher training. Bengali argued that Pakistan’s education crisis stems not from a lack of solutions but from a lack of political will. Panjwani insisted that schooling must shift from rote learning to genuine intellectual development.

The dedication to the late poet Akash Ansari, remembered for verses of resistance and longing, reinforced the festival’s refusal to separate culture from politics. If the days belonged to debate, the nights belonged to music. Saif Samejo’s performance turned the lawns into a shrine of Sindhi sound. But the festival’s emotional peak came from Ustaad Balo Khan, the famed tablenawaz of The Sketches, whose rhythmic mastery left the audience enchanted.

Throughout the festival, one truth stood out: the real heroes were the volunteers. Young men and women handling security, ushering, technical support, logistics, and speaker coordination worked with an ownership that made the event possible. Yet for all its vibrancy, SLF exposed the hollowness of Sindh’s cultural policy. A province that celebrates its saints cannot maintain their shrines. A government that praises its literary heritage neglects its libraries. Leaders who speak poetically about education preside over failing schools. Panels on the Indus cannot halt ecological ruin; discussions on intellectual responsibility cannot reverse the shrinking public sphere.

The festival survives not because of strong institutions but despite their fragility. It thrives because individuals – writers, musicians, activists, volunteers, donors – refuse to surrender to cultural decline. The 8th Sindh Literature Festival was therefore both inspiring and unsettling. Inspiring, because Sindh’s cultural spirit remains irrepressible, capable of drawing audiences across class and age. Unsettling, because the burden of preserving that spirit lies overwhelmingly on citizens rather than institutions.

Literature festivals should complement strong cultural policy, not compensate for its absence. Yet in Sindh they serve as cultural infrastructure, social glue and intellectual refuge all at once. In the end, the festival was a triumph – not of resources or state patronage, but of community resolve. It offered Karachi a brief reminder that ideas still matter, that communities can gather and that culture can resist neglect through sheer collective will. But unless Sindh begins investing seriously in libraries, museums, archives, schools and language initiatives, the SLF will remain what it has always been: brilliant, necessary and profoundly insufficient.


The writer holds a PhD from the University of Birmingham, UK. He tweets/posts @NaazirMahmood and can be reached at:

[email protected]